ASCI pulls HUL, GSK, others for misleading advertisements

ASCI pulls HUL, GSK, others for misleading advertisements

By  
SHARE

Advertising watchdog has pulled up several companies, including , , and , for misleading advertisements in July.

ASCI pulls HUL, GSK, others for misleading advertisements
Out of 134 complaints those were upheld, 44 each belonged to the healthcare and education category, followed by 24 in the food and beverages category and 8 in personal care

According to a PTI report: During the month, the Customer Complaints Council (CCC) of Advertising Standard Council of India (ASCI) upheld complaints against 134 misleading advertisements out of 183, which also included those of , and .

Out of 134 complaints those were upheld, 44 each belonged to the healthcare and education category, followed by 24 in the food and beverages category and 8 in personal care.

The ad regulator has found that claims of leading telecom services provider Bharti Airtel as the ‘best network’ as “incorrect and is misleading by implication” as it connotes many parameters associated with the performance for which different service providers have to compared.

“‘Transparency’ of communication providing input for improvement does not necessarily make any network the best,” ASCI was quoted by PTI as saying in its order.

Commenting on the order, an Airtel spokesperson was quoted by PTI as saying, it is “the first operator to have made public its entire network information in a transparent fashion and we strongly believe that only when we open ourselves to customer scrutiny will we become the best.”

He was further quoted by PTI as saying: “We do not agree with the observation made by ASCI and have shared all details with them.”

The regulator also upheld an ad by Tata Teleservices for its Docomo service as “misleading”, where it had claimed to charge Local/STD Mobile calls at 30p/min in Rs 68.

“The ad claims Rs 68 – Local/STD Mobile calls at 30p/min, is not substantiated and is misleading by ambiguity about the conditions under which this claim is tenable or exclusion criteria for which this offer is not available,” it was quoted by PTI as saying.

Himalaya Company failed to substantiate the claim made for its facewash, where the FMCG firm claimed the product has the goodness of neem and haldi that gives protection against every skin problems.

According to ASCI, Himalaya could not substantiate it with product efficacy data and the claim was misleading by exaggeration.